**/**** Image A- Sound A Extras B+
starring Daniel Kaluuya, Keke Palmer, Steven Yeun, Michael Wincott
written and directed by Jordan Peele
by Walter Chaw I don't think you ever see the heroes getting hurt, but they limp around a lot, and I couldn't stop wondering why. Just because it's more dramatic to be out of breath and limpy? There's a rule about not looking something in the eye, but I don't know how the horses can obey it, or if horses look up and behind them when they run. I've never seen them do that, in any case. If there's a rule about eyes, is the plan, in the end, to put eyes on the hood of that hoodie, and if it isn't, why did he? I understand there's a point being made here about how Hollywood doesn't care about the people who work in it--especially minorities and child actors--once their usefulness has been used up, yet I worry if by equating their trauma with a television chimp who goes insane and starts eating faces that the analogy, assuming there is one, has gotten as out of control as the chimp. There's a reveal that's less a reveal of an important plot point than a reveal that the reveal of an important plot point was left out somewhere. There's a powerful opening scene where something happens involving a nickel that is very effective up until the moment it's explained, at which point it no longer makes sense; why did it do what it did and not what it does for the rest of the film? Is it attracted to movement? Noise? It seems like both--but if so, how are folks constantly escaping it by moving around and making noise? That picture she takes? It looks ridiculous and will be convincing to no one. Wouldn't the camera and the film the famous cinematographer is shooting still be in one piece, like a black box, when the thing happens with the balloon? How is that the first balloon it's ever seen or eaten? If I ate a balloon (and could, for instance, withstand multiple gravities of speed and possibly interstellar travel), would I explode?
There's an apocryphal story about a rider handed out to the crew of M. Night Shyamalan's Signs warning, among other things, never to ask the director why his hydro-sensitive aliens would travel to a planet that is 71% water and prone to rain. I don't know if that's true, though I guess it doesn't matter. Signs is a handsomely mounted film--Shyamalan's third, he would tell you, but in reality his fifth--whose internal logic crumbles like a house of cards the moment any kind of pressure is placed on it. I try to avoid pulling threads in films so long as they earn a suspension of disbelief, and I think Signs is right there on the edge, teetering between pulling it off and doing a pratfall into a canyon of its own unnecessary, some would say arrogant, lapses in logic. The number of supporters it still has confirms that the things it does well, it does really well. Jordan Peele reminds me a great deal of M. Night Shyamalan. His first movie, Get Out (which actually is his first movie), was, like Shyamalan's "first" movie, The Sixth Sense (which is his third), so culturally indelible it introduced a phrase into the common vernacular. The problem with making a picture so massive it shifts the zeitgeist around it is not the high expectations attached to a follow-up but rather the way this much fame and power tends to fuck with your head. Maybe you don't rewrite your scripts so much anymore; maybe you stop listening to notes from people who are smart because you're the brand and everyone wants a piece of you. You have fewer people you trust. You start to believe your own press. You start to worry you're alone.
The choice presented to people who watch Jordan Peele's Us and now Nope is between a critical evisceration showing how the accumulation of sloppy details muddies the message or a rapturous embrace of a filmmaker with a keen sense of where to point the camera, an appreciation for the slow burn, and rage to spare about the way things are. The choice, in other words, is whether or not to believe the message is so important that it doesn't matter if the film has holes in it. The wonder of Get Out, leaving aside its literal cop-out of an ending, is that it's both brilliantly staged and About Something. The problem with Us is that its messaging is murky (or I'm too stupid to get it, and there's a good chance I am), and so its execution can only be as adroit as its unrefined middle. It shared this problem with the atrocious, Peele-produced reboot of "The Twilight Zone", whose episodes were too long and too proselytizing. Get Out works because it worries as much about the journey as it does about the destination. It's an object Peele's examined from every angle; its tensile strength has been tested and retested. It was seaworthy well before it was launched, because it had to be. His subsequent work takes on water before it leaves the shore, and I'm not convinced he sees it above the din of his vision.
Anyway, Nope is about a family of horse wranglers who rent out their services for various horse-related projects, only to find their future imperilled with the onset of convincing horse CGI and the mysterious death of their patriarch (Keith David), who has left behind a beautiful ranch decorated with, among other things, a framed poster of Sidney Poitier's Buck and the Preacher. The children who inherit the business are OJ (Daniel Kaluuya) and his sister Em (Keke Palmer)--the former his dad's longtime helper, the latter distracted by a cloud of side gigs she considers to be her primary gigs. This is not explored. After their latest horse-related gig goes awry due to a combination of OJ's introversion and Em's extroversion, OJ realizes he needs to sell another of their horses to Jupe (Steven Yeun), the former kid actor now slumming as the owner of a bizarre theme park, the theme of which we don't know until the middle of the film. Tell me again how it is that OJ didn't know, either.
Jupe used to be the "Arnold Drummond née Jackson" of some sitcom that was cancelled when its chimp star went full chimp. We see flashes of this incident, including a kid Jupe (Jacob Kim), the only member of the cast who survived with his face intact, looking terribly traumatized, which may explain why he thinks he has a way with predators. Or not, I don't know. One might surmise his confidence in predator-wrangling is derived from the residue of bravado a near-death experience leaves behind, like the Jeff Bridges character in Fearless. Again, I'm drawing from personal knowledge, not anything the film reveals in any way. Whatevs. Now I wonder if the popping balloons that set the chimp off are meant to be an instructive anecdote for the film's climactic solution, though I don't know how Em could have known about them. Whatevs. I think a lot of people will call Nope thought-provoking--and many of those people will have called Us thought-provoking, too. There's probably even an overlap with people who thought Tenet was thought-provoking. If you boil it down, I must grant that my thoughts are provoked by Nope but wish to add the caveat that it's possible to be fruitfully provoked, just as it's possible to be provoked because the plot is a mess.
Here's where the spoilers start: One day, OJ sees a UFO steal one of their horses. He and Em hatch a plan to get a good, clear video of it they can sell to Oprah Winfrey, thereby saving their farm. It's unclear whether the farm is in peril--we presume so because they had to sell a horse and OJ seems sad, but we don't know how dire the situation is, and in the end it doesn't matter. A good thing, as their plan is balls. In the course of tricking out their ranch with a couple of hi-tech cameras that suggest they can afford to keep the lights on for a while, they earn the attention of quirky comedic relief Geek Squadder Angel (Brandon Perea). Now a trio, they fail spectacularly at getting a clear shot of the bogey--mainly because the bogey carries with it a mobile EMP, which would have instantly made sense if this were the 1980s and everyone was afraid of nuclear annihilation but makes little impact now, especially when part of their plan, ultimately, is to outfit everyone with walkie-talkies they know won't work when they need them to the most. Oh, and the UFO is alive. Alas, Nope is a monster movie that can't figure out what its lore is, meaning either Peele doesn't care enough to create one or is now so bunkered and solipsistic he's convinced it doesn't matter if the lore is consistent, since what he has to say is so important. I know Peele isn't careless, so it must be the other: On the Shyamalan self-delusion timeline, in other words, he's closer now to Lady in the Water than to the obvious alien-invasion analogue of Signs. Working to his benefit, Peele does not appear in his own film as the author of the new Bible. Working to his detriment is that Signs, for all its howling inconsistencies in its pursuit of faux-A Prayer for Owen Meany profundity, is much scarier and tighter than Nope. Both are gorgeous shitshows, but Signs is a half-hour shorter and doesn't feel like it's missing entire scenes.
Which isn't to say there's nothing to recommend Nope. The cinematography, by Christopher Nolan's current fave Hoyte Van Hoytema, is glorious, and the Jaws-appropriating score by Michael Abels gives Nope a lightness it doesn't earn. Although it uses a sledgehammer to talk about how fame chews people up and spits them out, it's a point well-taken whenever and however it appears--even if it kinda sorta suggests a kinship between a monkey and a little Asian kid. The best thing about Nope is the cast. The taciturn, barely-vocal OJ is a fascinating and empathetic hero, and Kaluuya is a true movie star. Palmer is delightful and natural, playing an extremely irritating person without ever being irritating to watch. Yeun has cornered the market on vaguely traumatized, unsettlingly detached ciphers between this and Burning, while Perea makes for a charming himbo. As a Quint figure, Michael Wincott is pleasantly overcooked, although there is something about the way he's written--and what he represents--I found hostile and off-putting. He's not unlike the art critic in Nia DaCosta's woeful Candyman reboot, Peele's last production. (White people, amiright?) I kept wishing these actors were in a better movie, one that cared a bit more about crossing those t's and dotting those i's so you could spend more time enjoying their company and less time dwelling on all the stuff that's usually fun about movies like this. Originally published: July 21, 2022.
THE 4K UHD DISC
by Bill Chambers Universal brings Nope to 4K UHD disc in a 2160p transfer, complete with HDR10 encoding and a variable aspect ratio that toggles, in the fashion of DP Hoyte van Hoytema's collaborations with Christopher Nolan, between 2.20:1 and screen-filling 1.78:1 for IMAX footage. This is a handsome, refined presentation of sometimes-challenging elements--namely, it's an unabashedly dark film on occasion, and the image exhibits some aggressively steep black levels in nighttime shots that can be disengaging under sub-optimal viewing conditions. The application of HDR is more reserved than I anticipated when it comes to highlights (albeit very much in line with the 4K release of Nolan's/Hoytema's Tenet), but the wider colour gamut is definitely noticeable in a direct comparison with the attendant 1080p SDR Blu-ray. There's a scene where our heroes sit in a diner booth at 1:27:18 and the vinyl is a mesmerizing shade of lime green I had never, to the best of my recollection, seen my TV produce before. (It's still strikingly vivid on Blu-ray, just not as unique.) The IMAX scenes, shot on film, and non-IMAX scenes, shot in a digital simulation of 65mm, are at parity in terms of fine detail where my smallish (55") monitor is concerned. Nope looks perfectly lovely in its UHD debut, if a tad underwhelming. Here's where I tell you the 7.1 Dolby TrueHD mixdown of Nope's accompanying Dolby Atmos track is no slouch, but because so much of this film is characters gazing up at the sky, for the first time in ages I lamented my set-up's lack of height channels. Regardless, the intensely creepy sound design got under my skin; the captions at one point describe "soft popping," and it's a sound I never want to hear again, especially coming from behind me. Be prepared for angry wallops of bass: Peele uses them stealthily. Dialogue is consistently clear and well-prioritized--one area where the film definitively departs from its Nolan template.
The same gratifying line-up of supplements adorns the triple-layer 4K and dual-layer 2K platters, but on the former they're uniformly presented in 2160p, which seems to be a Universal hallmark. (Almost all of the extras are crunched down to 480i on Blu-ray, no doubt to maximize the bitrate of Nope itself.) Start with the 56-minute "Shadows: The Making of Nope", in which the interviewees address their remarks directly to the camera, Errol Morris-style. Writer-director Jordan Peele is front and centre figuratively as well, offering that his three films are deeply personal without spilling any tea beyond that--and fair enough, this might not be the right context for that. The first thing shot, we discover, was the Gordy attack; producer Ian Cooper, who will wax eloquent throughout these bonus features, says, "The sequence is a potent metaphor. The layers of exploitation are so myriad, it's wild." It's a far cry from Jason Blum's Encino Man soundbites. Van Hoytema talks about how you can get along well with somebody in preproduction but not have chemistry with them on set and lauds Peele for meeting the film's technical challenges head-on. I do feel that Peele achieved his stated goal of making Gordy's rampage horrific without villainizing Gordy himself, although I think the filmmakers are jumping through verbal hoops to justify its presence in Nope's narrative. Next, we visit a pivotal shooting location: an actual, abandoned Fry's the production stocked with merchandise--and, one presumes, those sea monsters sculpted into the walls. I love the idea of Hoytema rolling up to a big-box store with an IMAX camera on his arm. (Actually, a woman named Kristen "K2" Correll did all the handheld IMAX stuff, something Cooper likens admiringly to walking around with a hotel fridge strapped to your shoulder.) I love everything about Nope, really (its and Peele's oft-expressed love of animals is particularly endearing), yet the sum is somehow unequal to the parts.
Shorter featurettes follow. "Call Him Jean Jacket" (14 mins.) is about the creature or "critter," as UFO enthusiasts apparently refer to sentient ships. Peele says Close Encounters of the Third Kind was the most significant influence on the film, not only subject matter-wise but scale- and tone-wise, too--though VFX supervisor Guillaume Rocheron adds that Jaws was the first point of reference Peele discussed with him. There is much talk of Jean Jacket (the monster's nickname on camera and off) having an animal's amorality. Cooper compares it to King Kong and says, "Jean Jacket is an organism. It just has more 'otherness' than we're used to." I must admit, I marvelled at how fuckin' alien the damn thing is, with its infinitely unfolding square iris; Frank Herbert would be proud. (We learn that Jean Jacket was modelled on Robert Mapplethorpe's '80s photographs of orchids, the Cutty Sark, and Marilyn Monroe's billowing skirt in The Seven-Year Itch!) Kelsi Rutledge, a chipper Ph.D. candidate in the field of taxonomy and systematics, tells us she was hired to reverse-engineer Jean Jacket's anatomy for a faux research paper that would, if nothing else, appease this prestige blockbuster's sense of vanity. She even reveals its Latin name: Occulo nimbus, edo equis (Hidden dark cloud, stallion eater). Frankly, a documentary about these weird little Hollywood sidebars academics get roped into would probably be as entertaining as Nope itself.
In "Mystery Man of Muybridge" (5 mins.), Peele credits Cooper with gifting him an Eadweard Muybridge biography that turned him on to the pivotal Muybridge clip of the anonymous Black rider on horseback. We know the horse's name, Annie G., because she posed for Degas. Film professor Marta Braun observes that until Nope, historians barely acknowledged the jockey's racial identity, giving Peele licence and latitude to fabricate an origin story for Nope. Composer Michael Abel talks about how scoring the loop led to an unsettling four-note piece that felt like a foley session when he was recording it. A section containing five Deleted Scenes is notable for including the entire "Gordy" sequence pre-CGI, with famous simian movement coach Terry Notary performing as the chimpanzee. Unpleasant in its own way, it plays a lot like the set-piece from Ruben Östlund's The Square in which Notary terrorizes a banquet for patrons of the arts. The remaining elisions--"The Hiker," "Mallory," "The Offer," and "Be Careful"--wouldn't have contributed much except perhaps tacit confirmation that Keke Palmer's character is a lesbian. There's also...drumroll...a Gag Reel (5 mins.)! Haven't seen one of these in a while, and though Nope's plays like an office-party video unintended for public consumption in its high "you had to be there" quotient, it does feature a horse spoiling Kaluuya's plans by stopping to drop a deuce mid-take. An off-camera voice (Peele's?) exclaims, "We got this on IMAX!" I laughed. For what it's worth, the 4K release of Nope does not come with a digital copy of the film in Canada.
130 minutes; R; UHD: 2.20:1/1.78:1 (2160p/MPEG-H), HDR10, BD: 2.20:1/1.78:1 (1080p/MPEG-4); UHD: English Dolby Atmos (7.1 Dolby TrueHD core), French DD 5.1, Spanish DD+ 7.1, BD: English Dolby Atmos (7.1 Dolby TrueHD core), English DVS 2.0, French DD 5.1, Spanish DD+ 7.1; English SDH, French, Spanish subtitles; BD-100 + BD-50; Region-free; Universal